The Changing Face of Monogamy

Rania Bennett

Updated on:

The Changing Face of Monogamy

MONOGAMY IN INTELLIGENCE?

Is adultery a monogamous relationship? How about perpetual monogamy? These may seem trivial, but monogamy has been redefined, with up to 70% of all couples engaging in extramarital affairs.

Most of these couples, like those who divorce and remarry, think they are monogamous. Their behaviours do not match who they profess to be.
 
Individuals will likely adopt more acceptable labels, even if they are, to put it bluntly, false, as long as our society stigmatizes people, especially women who are open about their nonmonogamous desires and behaviours US Census data from 1999. According to the census, about half of all marriages have at least one partner remarried.
 
Although divorce rates in the United States are higher than in most other countries, serial monogamy is a worldwide trend. Infidelity is also one of the main reasons for divorce.

The original concept of monogamy advocated for lifelong sexual exclusivity between couples. Divorcing and remarrying were formerly called serial polygamy, not serial monogamy.
 
The subject I want to address here is not whether all marriages should last a lifetime; we may argue about that.
Instead, I’d like to call attention to the erroneous relationship that many people have between monogamy and fidelity.
 
Monogamy and devotion are sometimes used interchangeably. Commitment, in my view, is about keeping promises, and fidelity has more to do with honesty, respect, and loyalty than sexual exclusivity.

In terms of commitment, the terms of the agreement are insignificant.
 
We’ve gone insane when we hear that committed monogamous marriages are considered monogamous partnerships, even when they involve clandestine extramarital affairs.

Of course, monogamous people are susceptible to adultery. Polyamory practitioners may also realize they are having extramarital experiences, which is particularly disheartening for partners who hoped their relationship would be founded on openness and permission to adulterous relationships.
 
Although Ellen and Doug had vowed from the outset that their marriage would be open, neither had proceeded beyond the level of playful flirtation throughout their twelve years of a beautiful wedding.

Then, unexpectedly, Ellen fell passionately in love with William, a person she had known for years. She had kept her genuine feelings from Doug for many months to avoid upsetting him and fearing that he would destroy her newly acquired joy.
 
Doug was well-informed, according to William, who was aware of their open marriage. Doug was understandably shocked and deceived when Ellen finally confessed to loving William.

He was also concerned that she might abandon him and wanted to return to monogamy. Even when couples agree to be honest with one another, the habit of keeping secrets may become deeply entrenched.

Communication and Negotiation Skills

Effective communication is a critical component of relational anarchy. It requires openly, honestly, and transparently sharing one’s wants, desires, and limitations with partners.

This communication style is sometimes called “radical honesty” because it enables partners to comprehend one another’s points of view and negotiate their desires in a mutually beneficial manner.
 
 Radical honesty is critical in relationship anarchy because it allows partners to understand one another’s points of view and arrange their wants in a mutually beneficial way.
 
Active listening is just as vital as extreme honesty in relationship anarchy. Active listening is paying close attention to what one’s partner is saying, identifying their feelings, and replying in a way that exhibits empathy and understanding.
 This kind of communication fosters intimacy and trust, essential in a failing relationship.
 
Negotiation is a critical skill in relational anarchy. A fundamental component of negotiating is striking a balance between personal desires and relational obligations.

It encourages partners to be willing to compromise, to be adaptive and open-minded, and to consider the perspectives of others.

Negotiating in a broken relationship is about reaching an arrangement that benefits all parties, not winning or losing.
 
Moreover, for negotiation to occur in a disorderly relationship, both parties must be aware of possible power dynamics. Power or control imbalances may exist in every interaction, referred to as power dynamics.
 
Therefore, when a relationship is disorderly, it is critical to confront power dynamics and negotiate fairly and equitably.

For example, if one partner has more non-monogamy experience than the other, they may be better positioned to influence the union’s terms.
 
 In this situation, the more experienced spouse must recognize their position of power and bargain while keeping their partner’s wants and limitations in mind.
 
One of the disadvantages of relational anarchy is the lack of established societal norms or expectations. This may generate ambiguity and concern for some individuals.

Excellent communication and bargaining skills, on the other hand, may assist in reducing some of these challenges by building a clear understanding of the relationship and its boundaries.
 
In addition, partners in relationship anarchy may use tools like check-ins and regular talks to ensure everyone is on the same page and that the relationship is evolving pleasantly for all parties.

It’s important to remember that effective communication and bargaining skills aren’t only for tumultuous love relationships. These skills are essential in both monogamous and non-monogamous relationships.
 
Intimacy, trust, and understanding are critical components in every healthy relationship, and they are fostered through excellent communication and negotiation skills.
 
Partners in an anarchic relationship may build a shared knowledge of the relationship and ensure that it develops in a way that is satisfactory to all parties by being aware of power dynamics and employing tools such as check-ins and regular conversations.

These qualities are required in all relationships and are not limited to Anarchy ones.

Emotional Growth and Self-Awareness

Relationship anarchy may be a powerful tool for personal development when employed in the context of emotional growth and self-awareness.
 
Relationship anarchists must confront their emotions, desires, and worries by promoting communication and individual autonomy.

Self-examination may lead to considerable personal growth and a deeper understanding of oneself and others.
 
One of the critical tenets of relationship anarchy is the notion that each person is responsible for their emotional well-being.
 
Therefore, relationship anarchists take responsibility for their emotions and seek aid from various individuals, such as friends, family, and therapists, rather than relying on their partner.

This focus on emotional responsibility and self-care may increase self-awareness and a stronger sense of self.
 
A crucial component of relational anarchy is the emphasis on communication and consent. Relationship anarchists value open and honest communication, actively seeking criticism and advice from their partners to develop and maintain good relationships.

By fostering a culture of consent and mutual respect, relationship anarchists create an environment where each person may express their needs and wishes without fear of criticism or rejection.
 
This emphasis on communication and consent may also develop more emotional connection and openness in partnerships.
 
By encouraging partners to share their ideas and feelings honestly and openly, relationship anarchists create a climate where everyone can be ultimately seen and heard.

This process of emotional intimacy may lead to a better understanding of oneself and others and improve sentiments of connection and empathy.
 
Of course, relationship anarchy is not without its challenges. The emphasis on personal autonomy and responsibility may result in relationships that need more stability and structure.

Establishing a sense of security and trust in a relationship may be more accessible with defined expectations and limitations.
 
Moreover, the focus on consent and communication may sometimes be overwhelming or depleting, needing significant emotional labour from all those involved.
 
Despite these challenges, relationship anarchy may be a powerful tool for emotional growth and self-awareness.

Relationship anarchists provide a supportive atmosphere for human growth and development by emphasizing communication, individual autonomy, and emotional responsibility.

Whether new to relationship anarchy or a seasoned practitioner, the notion offers a unique and fascinating approach to relationships and personal growth.

Connection and Intimacy

In traditional relationships, closeness is frequently defined by exclusivity and a sense of ownership over one’s partner.

On the other hand, relationship anarchists disagree with this notion and believe that closeness may be experienced by many people in various ways.

Since individuals are not bound by a specific partner or a predetermined set of expectations, this approach to intimacy fosters a better sense of connection and depth in relationships.
 
One of the essential components of connection and intimacy in relationship anarchy is the emphasis on communication and consent.

Since relationship anarchists oppose the concept of ownership over one’s partner, both partners must be conscious of each other’s needs and limits.

Communication is essential for maintaining cordial and productive relationships.

Moreover, everyone involved must be willing to respect one another’s autonomy and be adaptable enough to renegotiate limitations as needed.
 
Another essential component of connection and intimacy in relationship anarchy is the focus on self-awareness and personal growth.

Relationship anarchists prioritize one’s development and self-discovery more than a partner satisfying one’s demands and wishes.
 
As a result, individuals are encouraged to pursue their interests and passions, even if it means devoting time away from their relationships.

People may build their sense of self and reach their full potential in this way, improving their relationships’ quality.
One of the criticisms of relationship anarchy is that there is no sense of exclusivity, making it impossible to create long-term, committed partnerships.

Relationship anarchists argue that this isn’t always the case. There may be no predefined expectations in a romantic anarchist dynamic, yet individuals may still opt to commit to one another and work to develop a lasting bond.
 
Since they reject traditional norms and expectations, relationship anarchists are free to create rules and restrictions that work for them.
 
Proximity and connection are important aspects of relational anarchy. By rejecting traditional conceptions of exclusivity and ownership, relationship anarchists can develop more profound and rewarding connections with others
 
Individuals may build solid and long-lasting relationships based on autonomy and mutual respect by being honest with one another, prioritizing their growth, and being willing to experiment with different sorts of intimacy
 
Relationship anarchy offers a unique and original viewpoint on love and relationships that is worth considering, even if it is not for everyone.

Leave a Comment